November 28 2021

Nigella & the unfair application of our drug laws

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on twitter

Nigella & the unfair application of our drug laws

Release- drug possession pic

This week it was announced that the Metropolitan police will take no further action after Nigella Lawson admitted to drug use in court.

Whilst Scotland Yard was accused of ‘giving the green light to middle class drug taking’ by some anti-drug campaigners, we must be mindful of the consequences that these prosecutions bring upon anyone. A criminal conviction for drug possession can negatively impact an individual’s future employment, education and ability to travel.

What this case does bring up however, are the broader issues of social inequalities, alongside the unfair treatment and application of the drug laws by enforcement agencies. It is precisely these concerns of disproportionality that exist within our criminal justice system that are in the focus of our report, The Numbers in Black and White.

Launched with the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) last August, the report shows how the policing and prosecutions of drug possession offences in England and Wales is unduly focused on black and minority communities.

The scale of stop and search
Stop and search has increased steadily since 2001/2 from less than 750,000 to a peak of 1.3 million in 2010/11. Despite a slight decline, there were still more than one million stop and searches carried out in 2011/12, with half or more of these for drugs. Further to this, the research identifies police stop and search as a key driver of ethnic inequality throughout the criminal justice system.

It highlights that those from black and minority ethnic (BME) backgrounds are being searched at a rate of over six times that of their white counterparts and are being subjected to harsher sanctions.

Whilst rates of disproportionality in London are lower than the UK as a whole, the intensity of stop and search is far higher – a rate of 34 per 1000 across the population as a whole compared to 10 per 1000 nationally. Whilst the Metropolitan police have recognised the problem and have reduced the number of stop and searches from a peak of 250,000 to 170,000 in the last 12 months, this rate is still enormously high.

What is clear from the London data is that it is areas of deprivation that are subject to high rates of stop and search for drugs, with police use of this power being focussed on areas such as Haringey and Hackney rather than say Canary Wharf or Richmond. Clearly, this speaks directly to the inequitable application of our drugs laws.

History of a target culture
The notion of a ‘targeted culture’ is upheld when looking at the percentage of those proceeded against for possession offences that hold a previous conviction. Forty per cent of those from BME communities had been charged or warned before, compared with just 24% of white persons. Recognising that an increased frequency of stop and searches for black persons subsequently heightens their propensity for having a conviction, led us to factor this into our analysis. Omitting any previous convictions from the data meant that the entire sample was at the same level within the criminal justice system. Despite this, 60% of black people were charged with possession of cocaine, in comparison with just 26% of those who were white. This is despite the fact that the Government’s own data shows black people use drugs at a lower rate than white people.

The issue of disproportionate policing of BME communities is not a new one. Stop and search powers have been repeatedly cited as a flashpoint in some of the greatest disturbances witnessed in modern day Britain. Both the Brixton Riots of the 1980s and the more recent riots of August 2011 were linked to the discriminatory use of stop and search.

The tragic murder of Stephen Lawrence, and the subsequent MacPherson enquiry into policing, highlighted the problems that exist in relation to stop and search. For over 30 years this issue has been in the spotlight and despite the calls for reform and the various inquiries, the level of racial disparity in the use of stop and search has continued to rise.

An alternative approach
With the policing of drugs driving the huge numbers of stop and search in the UK the only way to effectively overcome these issues of disparity is to move away from the criminal law enforcement model currently adopted in this country. Release’s publication, A Quiet Revolution promotes the introduction of decriminalisation of drug possession. It reveals, through global examples such as Portugal and the Czech Republic, the false ideology of an increased prevalence of drug use when non-criminal sanctions or a decision not to enforce the criminal law is adopted, and instead highlights the reduced harms caused by criminalisation. For example, since Portugal decriminalised drug use and possession in 2001, it has not only seen a substantial reduction in criminal justice procedural costs, but has seen a significant reduction in lifetime and recent drug use among 15-24 year olds.

Overall, the policing and prosecution of drug offences is not being equally applied to all those who use drugs. It is impossible for the State to police the estimated 3 million people who use drugs annually in the UK. Instead, certain groups are the focus of enforcement. It is because of this, that changes to UK drug policy are fundamental in order to bring about a fairer and more compassionate legal framework to manage drug us.

5 responses to “Nigella & the unfair application of our drug laws”

  1. handytrim says:

    It is of my opinion that there is less a desire to go after the wealthy users of illegal substances simply because they can afford the solicitors who will get them off the ridiculous charges. And especially in the case of public figures and media personalities, if the charge is nothing more than the personal use of these substances how terrible would it be for our prohibition loving politicians to have spread all over the tabloids and media that the case was thrown out as there is nothing illegal about putting potentially harmful substances into ones own body. If that were the case we’d all be up in court charged with consuming far too much sugar, which is a gateway drug to fat, caffeine, alcohol, tobacco, crack cocaine! But that hasn’t stopped our corrupt justice system from ruining millions of (poor) peoples lives in the past or the near future.

    David Cameron has flimflammed his way on the subject by supporting changes to our ineffectual and harmful drug policies before he came to power and then, as per the norm, he changed his mind once in a position to do so. Even going as far as to make the ludicrous statement that our current policies are effectual and producing results. Results such as the rise in (many times more dangerous than the more ‘traditional’ substances) ‘legal’ highs which his drugs minister has admitted is completely out of control and they are stumped as to how to deal with the issue, preferring to stick to the tried and tested failure of banning and prohibiting.

    It was once the case that the drug issue was a political hot potato. It is increasingly becoming obvious that it is now a flaming turnip that threatens to discredit and humiliate those who prefer propaganda and spin over direct action and responsibility.

  2. Darryl Bickler says:

    Actually there is no offence of ‘using’ cocaine, in fact there is no offence of ‘using’ any drug other than opium. The law (as it continues to be misadministered) controls all ordinary citizens property rights in controlled drugs, thus whilst possession of such property thus can lead to an offence, there is no prospect of a charge without the physical evidence of the thing itself as opposed to the vacuous admission that one has previously used.

  3. […] The Justice Gap: Nigella & the unfair application of our drug laws. […]

  4. barry351 says:

    I have used heroin for 25 years (safely) if one does not use a thing then how can they know about it ? I see so many people saying so many bad things about drugs (doctor phil) for one. Has he ever used heroin ? No so how can he know more about it than I do since I have used it ? Do you know all drugs I mean all drugs have been totally legal far longer than they have been illegal. It was all about racism and religions that made drugs illegal nothing else. I have spent 7 years in washington state prison systems for possession of heroin the seperate trips. I have harmed no one I do not steal to pay for my drug use. I am healthy more healthy than most people and yet I use heroin all the time. Opiates used along with a healthy diet and exersise do no harm to the human body. I dont know what to say about other drugs like cocaine or methamphetime they cause the body to stay awake for long periods and curb ones appetite so you dont eat properly. If used sparingly I feel they are safe but if abused I have seen many friends age rapidly from uppers.
    All drugs can be used safely or they can be abused just like alcohol, If you are stupid enough to abuse drugs they can kill you but so can driving a car improperly.

  5. blogs says:

    is a blogsite with blogs on the current political system in the US.

    Make useful tutorials to the public solve a problem that people are often looking for examples
    of ” late entry problems indexed by the search engines “.
    Another big topic people love to blog about is their family.

Related Posts